Prognostic and predictive factors of brain meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Common primary brain tumors are meningiomas with year incidence 3-8 cases per 100 000 people. Even though we mainly speak about benign disease, with its character and localization, it worsens the life quality to its bearer. The main therapeutic methods are neurosurgery extirpation and stereotactic radiosurgery. Despite reaching very good therapeutic results with both methods, some of the patients suffer with recurrence of the disease requiring other interventions with the risk of creating or worsening a neurological deficit. Small meningiomas without growing tendency and with the absence of symptomatology are observed. On the other hand, we cannot be satisfied with long-term results of the therapy of meningiomas with more aggressive bio-logical behavior. A higher grade is a known risk of meningioma recurrence; however, it is often difficult to identify subgroups that show advantage of a combination of neurosurgery and radiosurgery, respectfully at which it is appropriate to look for ways to treatment escalation, and that is with the risk of side effects. The analysis of hormonal, cytogenetics and epigenetics tumor equipment seems to be the most promising for the development of personalized treatment. PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to sum up the facts about epidemiology, treatment algorithms and the prognosis of brain meningiomas and to suggest perspective prognostic and predictive factors for maximally individualized therapy.

[Intensity Modulated Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy to Treat Advanced Head and Neck Cancer - Predictive Factors of Overall Survival]. / Hyperfrakcionovaná akcelerovaná radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou u pokrocilých nádoru hlavy a krku - prediktivní faktory celkového prezití.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors in patients ineligible for chemotherapy who were treated with a hyperfractionated accelerated schedule with simultaneous integrated boost. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May, 2008, to April, 2013, 122 patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic squamous laryngeal (14%), hypopharyngeal (30%), oropharyngeal (30%), and oral cavity (27%) cancer were treated at our institution. The median age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and gross tumor volume (GTV) of the patients were 63 years (range, 46-87 years), 80% (range, 50-100%), and 46 ml (range, 5-250 ml), resp. The median total dose of radiotherapy was 72.6 Gy (range, 62-77 Gy) at 1.4-1.5 Gy per fraction, and 55 Gy at 1.1 Gy per fraction was delivered for GTV (primary and lymphadenopathy) with a margin of 0.7 cm and regional lymphatic areas with a margin of 0.3 cm. The dose was delivered 2× a day, with a 6-8 hour interval between doses, via a 6 MeV linear accelerator. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors of OS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The median duration of the radiotherapy series was 37 days (range, 32-45 days). The incidence of grade 3 acute toxicity was 62% for mucosa (oral cavity and/or pharynx) and 0% for skin. Confluent mucositis cleared in all cases within 21 days. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were recorded. PEG was introduced before treatment in 55 patients (45%). The 1-and 2-year OS was 65% and 32%, resp. KPS less than 80% (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.2; p = 0.004), cancers other than oropharyngeal or laryngeal cancer (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.5; p = 0.016), and capacity of high GTV (RR 1.006, 95% CI 1.001-1.011; p = 0.017) were found to be negative prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: More than 30% of patients with poor prognosis survived for longer than 2 years. KPS before treatment was the strongest prognostic factor for better OS.Key words: head and neck cancer - radiotherapy dose fractionation - survival analysis - acceleration - hyperfractionation This work was supported by RVO-FNOs/2016 (HPV status as predictive and prognostic factor for primary and secondary head and neck cancer). The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 9. 3. 2017Accepted: 19. 4. 2017.

[Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer - Effectiveness and Toxicity]. / Stereotaktická radioterapie karcinomu prostaty - efektivita a toxicita.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in males and its incidence is steadily increasing. Most cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed during the early asymptomatic period, in which case the prognosis is very good. Therapies differ widely in their efficacies and toxicities, and this is an important consideration when it comes to deciding which treatment is optimal for a particular patient. One treatment method for early stage prostate cancer is stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We present the first results obtained using this modality at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 261 patients with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer were treated with SBRT between August 2010 and July 2012. Patients received a total dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions of 7.25 Gy every other day. The toxicity of the treatment was evaluated according to RTOG criteria. For assessment of quality of life, patients filled out a modified EPIC questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Composite index). RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) in this study was 93.1%. Biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) was 97.7%. As expected, OS and bRFS were worse in the group of patients with an intermediate risk of recurrence. Acute and chronic urinary and gastrointestinal RTOG toxicity was very low. Quality of life after treatment, as determined using the EPIC questionnaire, was slightly reduced immediately after treatment but returned to baseline or even improved during long term follow-up. CONCLUSION: SBRT is an effective therapeutic modality for early prostate cancer and has acceptable rates of acute and low late toxicity.Key words: prostate cancer - stereotactic body radiotherapy - quality of life The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 5. 1. 2017Accepted: 1. 2. 2017.